I doubt that ever a few of the undoubtedly well-governed, democratic and human rights-respecting countries of the world has complained that a supranational organization like the UN, EU, Amnesty, or the Nobel Prize committee had interfered in its "internal affairs". . It is a privilege of dictatorships, sham democracies or otherwise degenerate countries
So on Friday, for example, again castigated the spokeswoman of the Chinese Foreign Ministry, Jiang Yu, the awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize to Liu Xiaobo : Preserve "We are strictly opposed to abuse any country or person the Nobel Prize to be in the internal affairs interfere in China and interfere in China's judicial sovereignty. "If one reads the complete statement of lady, one can only hope that she is paid well for it to publicly disseminate such crap in all seriousness. Liu sits well known because of subversive activities receive a long prison term from and was the prize in Oslo personally.
So on Friday, for example, again castigated the spokeswoman of the Chinese Foreign Ministry, Jiang Yu, the awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize to Liu Xiaobo : Preserve "We are strictly opposed to abuse any country or person the Nobel Prize to be in the internal affairs interfere in China and interfere in China's judicial sovereignty. "If one reads the complete statement of lady, one can only hope that she is paid well for it to publicly disseminate such crap in all seriousness. Liu sits well known because of subversive activities receive a long prison term from and was the prize in Oslo personally.
Talk of the internal affairs, in which should interfere kindly no one is really a brand where one of the rogue states of the world recognizes.
A some random googled examples: In April 2008, forbade Hugo Chavez's interference in the "internal affairs" of Venezuela by Angela Merkel. Iran's Ahmadinejad complained in a 2006 letter to Angela Merkel: "For many years they interfered (the winner of the 2nd World War) Join our internal affairs." In September 2004, forbade the Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan "interfering in internal affairs" by the EU. 2003 condemned North Korea to appeal to the UN Security Council in conflict over its nuclear program as "interference in its internal affairs."
Israel is not a rogue state, but some of his Citizens and politicians would like to make one: In September 2010 accused the hard-right party of Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, the U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton an unfair interference in internal affairs of Israel, because they had criticized the settlement policy.
rogue states make also like to protect against its peer: The African Union has indicated on many occasions, they would not interfere in the "internal affairs" of Zimbabwe and its Member States could take so unfortunately nothing against the horror policies of the local state criminal Robert Mugabe . When the Russian Duma in 2006 by Belarus, the last dictatorship in Europe caused, they approved the Declaration on the inadmissibility of interference in internal affairs of Belarus. In September 2010, took the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China, the Military junta of Burma / Myanmar to international criticism to the controversial elections in protection. The spokeswoman Jiang Yu spoke of an "interference in internal affairs" of Burma - the lady obviously has only this one phrase on it.
If rogue states sometimes make concerned about the internal affairs of countries that are not rogue states, it is behind most of preventing the desire that concurrent power to a small neighboring country that regards the great rogue state as its eternal sphere of influence comes to the rescue. Therefore Russia complained in 2009, the then NATO Mannöver in Georgia were an interference in the internal affairs of the country.
For China, it has long been one of its main principles to be used against any kind of "interference" in internal affairs of other dictatorships. Behind this is naturally the idea: If one accepts even a single time in a particularly bad case, that there are certain inalienable universal human rights and moral principles that must be respected in every country and justifies its disregard of a reprimand or even sanctions, then you can continue to insist that poor, tortured in their own country unmolested, executions and arbitrary arrest may be.
because nothing more is what all this talk of home affairs. Although in Chapter I, Article 2, weighed general paragraph 7 of the UN Carta principles of the right of countries to self-determination and states that "in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state are, or the commitment of the members, to submit such matters to settlement to the present Charter not be derived ... "But then in the early age of de-colonization, the authors thought mainly due to the protection of former colonies from the tutelage of their former colonial masters. And when the UN, for example, 1981 for repeatedly interfering in internal affairs of states as well as military interventions, known as unacceptable , she did, to condemn the Russian invasion of Afghanistan.
other day. When states repeatedly emphasize that no one should interfere in their internal affairs, they want to say really: we want torture calmly on, suppress minorities, destroy the environment, dissidents in jail, build nuclear weapons and fake elections without us, the UN, Amnesty International or whoever is bothersome.
why it should make us hear everything, if someone like CDU parliamentary leader Volker Kauder, the Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan "interference in the internal affairs of Germany accuses because that Turkish immigrants had warned of too much integration (as happened in 2008). Certainly no one wants Kauder torture. But he should know that it hurts with such quasi-Chinese chatter the reputation of Germany. That should
perhaps someone tell Peter Harry Carstensen. The CDU prime minister of Schleswig-Holstein in 2005 wrote a letter to the then Minister of State for Culture Christina Weiss, they should kindly not to interfere in the internal affairs of Schleswig-Holstein.
Israel is not a rogue state, but some of his Citizens and politicians would like to make one: In September 2010 accused the hard-right party of Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, the U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton an unfair interference in internal affairs of Israel, because they had criticized the settlement policy.
rogue states make also like to protect against its peer: The African Union has indicated on many occasions, they would not interfere in the "internal affairs" of Zimbabwe and its Member States could take so unfortunately nothing against the horror policies of the local state criminal Robert Mugabe . When the Russian Duma in 2006 by Belarus, the last dictatorship in Europe caused, they approved the Declaration on the inadmissibility of interference in internal affairs of Belarus. In September 2010, took the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China, the Military junta of Burma / Myanmar to international criticism to the controversial elections in protection. The spokeswoman Jiang Yu spoke of an "interference in internal affairs" of Burma - the lady obviously has only this one phrase on it.
If rogue states sometimes make concerned about the internal affairs of countries that are not rogue states, it is behind most of preventing the desire that concurrent power to a small neighboring country that regards the great rogue state as its eternal sphere of influence comes to the rescue. Therefore Russia complained in 2009, the then NATO Mannöver in Georgia were an interference in the internal affairs of the country.
For China, it has long been one of its main principles to be used against any kind of "interference" in internal affairs of other dictatorships. Behind this is naturally the idea: If one accepts even a single time in a particularly bad case, that there are certain inalienable universal human rights and moral principles that must be respected in every country and justifies its disregard of a reprimand or even sanctions, then you can continue to insist that poor, tortured in their own country unmolested, executions and arbitrary arrest may be.
because nothing more is what all this talk of home affairs. Although in Chapter I, Article 2, weighed general paragraph 7 of the UN Carta principles of the right of countries to self-determination and states that "in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state are, or the commitment of the members, to submit such matters to settlement to the present Charter not be derived ... "But then in the early age of de-colonization, the authors thought mainly due to the protection of former colonies from the tutelage of their former colonial masters. And when the UN, for example, 1981 for repeatedly interfering in internal affairs of states as well as military interventions, known as unacceptable , she did, to condemn the Russian invasion of Afghanistan.
other day. When states repeatedly emphasize that no one should interfere in their internal affairs, they want to say really: we want torture calmly on, suppress minorities, destroy the environment, dissidents in jail, build nuclear weapons and fake elections without us, the UN, Amnesty International or whoever is bothersome.
why it should make us hear everything, if someone like CDU parliamentary leader Volker Kauder, the Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan "interference in the internal affairs of Germany accuses because that Turkish immigrants had warned of too much integration (as happened in 2008). Certainly no one wants Kauder torture. But he should know that it hurts with such quasi-Chinese chatter the reputation of Germany. That should
perhaps someone tell Peter Harry Carstensen. The CDU prime minister of Schleswig-Holstein in 2005 wrote a letter to the then Minister of State for Culture Christina Weiss, they should kindly not to interfere in the internal affairs of Schleswig-Holstein.
0 comments:
Post a Comment