The U.S. should Assange prefer a medal
Today we received the news that the U.S. Air Force on their computers or media such as Spiegel and the Guardian has Block can publish the Wikileaks documents. The action has been rightly ridiculed as stone age and stupid. It is also stupid because it would have to be slowly but surely set to continue for Americans to realize that their country and their diplomats for nearly three weeks stand revelations actually brilliant.
The big filth and lies of the Americans who are on their exposure to the left, anti American and pro-Islamic Internet community has been a joy but so far failed completely. Even the supposed scandal rather throw a bad light on the countries from which reports the diplomats to the United States. If the U.S. ambassador, writes British intelligence people would have signaled to the Russians, they had the murderer of former Russian spy Alexander Litvinenko as good arrest and how these them then but through their fingers went , then it shows a moment, what a realistic picture Americans from the supposed favorite ally of ex-President George W. Bush did.
The reports from countries such as Tunisia, Italy, Kazakhstan, Turkey, Russia and Bolivia are not so embarrassing for the U.S. ( here the amazing interactive world map of the Guardian, where you can click and sort the reports by country). If Russia as a "mafia state" is known, then stir it but only Putin. If it on the Tunisian president's wife is that she was hated by the people as a snake head of the pervasive corruption and its decadent in the luxury indulgent son is a Tiger would keep as a pet - just as it once Uday Hussein did with lions, then says that a clear in the positive sense undiplomatic language about conditions in the country.
When an American says that it can possibly still be regarded as a red herring. The foreign policy expert Leslie H. Money wrote a week ago showed on the online magazine The Daily Beast the dispatches be under no Rogue state, but instead. "Yet A United States seriously and professionally trying to solve the most dangerous problems in a frighteningly complicated world, lacking the power to dictate solutions
This also has one of the pro-American bias certainly unsuspected Alt-linkers such as Pinned Günter Wallraff, who says of the Wikileaks revelations : "I suddenly respect had before the U.S. diplomats: how accurately they describe but our politicians and how realistic their views on Turkey, Russia and other world regions."
similar Hector Abad, the Colombian noted surprised. In the magazine El Espectador he writes ( translation of pearl): "As for Colombia, the gringo diplomacy is amazing as well: If one reads the published diplomatic cable set, the U.S. officials clearly a for most honorable and democratic things as their official Colombian interlocutor. Interestingly, practice the Americans on issues such as respect for human rights, the issue of extrajudicial killings, trials, members of intimidating, inappropriate behavior of the armed forces compromises in the fight against drug traffickers and guerrillas actually print out! Who gets away, however bad, are the Colombian Officers, on the other side, especially former President Uribe and his subordinates. Even in view of Hugo Chavez, the gringos prove to be more reasonable. . While Uribe Chavez - similar loud-mouthed as Chavez himself - compared to Hitler, describing him as the Yankees 'bright politician and skillful strategists' "
to the same conclusion also an author of British magazine The Economist is gekommen.Er writes:" It was hard to demonize America on the basis of a few hundred dispatches that have been published. And you can not say that Wikileaks has harmed America devastating. "
One of the most controversial revelations concerned the Baltic States in late 2009 asked a question to be included in the NATO defense plans for Poland and the eastern border of the Alliance. While Russia did shocked and asked for immediate clarification. But Putin and Medvedev did, after all, the Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania are just occurred therefore in NATO - in order to be finally protected effectively against its major annexations happy neighbors. The Economist-author writes: "It is hard to imagine that anything in these leaks greatly surprised the Kremlin." Surprisingly
have been numerous revelations, proving that the Arab states make it a time less concerned about Israel than for Iran. And that they all push the U.S. to crack down against Ahmadinejad & Co. But this is not for the U.S. defamatory - quite the contrary.
The previous show at Wikileaks published diplomatic dispatches a world power that sees its allies absolutely disgusting, partly realistic and try to positively influence these rogue states. And they show that America is still - like Hitler's time - the country is that you ask for help and advice if you feel threatened by the heavily armed dictatorships in the world. In it are so different systems such as the Arab potentates and the Baltic democracies agreed.
Of course, under all the publications from time to time pretty gossip found objects, such as that the military rulers of Burma to buy-considered, and the soccer club Manchester United. And indeed there are also occasional evidence of tangible influences of U.S. diplomats who Poltiker example, in Mexico or Spain, may not be purchased directly, but less severe powdered. Most of the time is not necessary: The politicians in most countries are quite sneaks by itself - as the German Social Democrats of Steinmeier to Nahles, the ausweinten at U.S. diplomats on political opponents and party members and himself as a reliable Partners recommended.
I seldom agree with Iran's president, but his suspicion that it was potentially a huge campaign that would distract that U.S. intelligence agencies from inside polti around the problems of the country, is definitely better founded than the opinion of Fidel Castro which today writes Julian Assange and Wikileaks had set the "empire" in the dock. Even the Colombian Hector Abad, it looks like me: "One is almost tempted to give the Iranian president is right when he says the world power USA had itself provided for the disclosure of the documents in order before the eyes of the world to give a good picture .
course Americans have not done that. For as I wrote : I do not believe in conspiracy theories. But there will come a time in which to understand at least the more intelligent members of American government that the CIA has never installed a successful control agent as it is just the America-haters Assange now. And then they will probably give him a medal instead to pursue it legally, and its website to block. By the way, that would be the safest way to do it politically. Because it just can not be in the interest of the United States, they will wait hopefully for a long time.
0 comments:
Post a Comment